Chinese vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,809,883 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.774% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 774.2 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $58,847, a difference of 31.6%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $82,029, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $98,091, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $53,925, a difference of 5.5%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $45,197, a difference of 8.1%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $42,180, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 40.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 38.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.2%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 70.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.2%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.3%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (68.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.2%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.7%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.9%).