Indonesian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,148,561 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Indonesian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.450. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indonesians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.105% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indonesians corresponds to a decrease of 104.9 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,543 compared to $119,756, a difference of 50.6%), per capita income ($37,300 compared to $54,264, a difference of 45.5%), and median household income ($72,856 compared to $105,335, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 17.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,566 compared to $57,931, a difference of 27.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,176 compared to $69,174, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 63.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 58.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.20%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 30.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 47.9%), births to unmarried women (35.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 41.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (61.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 47.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.36%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 92.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 83.3%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 67.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (96.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.63%), nursery school (96.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 52.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.0%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.5%).