Chinese vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,181,595 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.873. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.281% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 281.2 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,976, a difference of 25.0%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $87,553, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $103,584, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,064, a difference of 1.4%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,041, a difference of 1.7%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,739, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 43.5%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 42.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.6%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.88%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 29.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.84%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 4.1%).