Yakama vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Yakama
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Yakama
Immigrants from China
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Yakama Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,031,841 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.579. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.306% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to a decrease of 306.2 Immigrants from China.
Yakama vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,009 compared to $54,264, a difference of 64.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $119,756, a difference of 57.1%), and median male earnings ($45,002 compared to $67,353, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $57,931, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $69,174, a difference of 23.0%).
Income Metric | Yakama | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $33,009 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $83,932 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,225 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,107 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,002 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,354 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,321 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $76,226 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,992 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,234 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.7% | Poor 26.7% |
Yakama vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 124.0%), married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 80.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 21.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 28.9%).
Poverty Metric | Yakama | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.3% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.3% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.6% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 28.3% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.0% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Yakama vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 137.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 90.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 79.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Yakama | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.3% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 7.9% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.7% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 15.6% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.5% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.7% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.7% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Yakama vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Yakama | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.8% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.9% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.1% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.6% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.1% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Yakama vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 126.7%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 66.2%), and births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.45 compared to 3.23, a difference of 6.7%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and family households (69.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 7.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Yakama | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Exceptional 69.3% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.8% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.45 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.0% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.3% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Yakama vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 129.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 114.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 10.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 70.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Yakama | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 31.0% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 12.9% | Poor 6.0% |
Yakama vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 140.6%), master's degree (9.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 123.8%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 118.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.93%).
Education Level Metric | Yakama | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 86.9% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 85.0% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 82.5% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 80.0% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 74.5% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.6% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 46.2% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 32.3% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Yakama vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 64.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 55.8%), and hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 3.8%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.7%).
Disability Metric | Yakama | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.00% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 29.6% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.3% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.9% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |