Chinese vs Puerto Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,576,796 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.770% in Puerto Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 770.0 Puerto Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $42,550, a difference of 82.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $69,234, a difference of 67.8%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $59,197, a difference of 66.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $31,560, a difference of 31.4%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $35,560, a difference of 37.3%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 38.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 246.5%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 212.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 176.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 80.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 84.7%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 104.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 86.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 84.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 82.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 43.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 49.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 69.3%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 51.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.28, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (68.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 88.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 87.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 8.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 27.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 52.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 89.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 76.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 20.6%).