Chinese vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,594,663 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.523% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 522.8 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,104, a difference of 26.8%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $86,084, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $103,682, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $55,965, a difference of 1.6%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $44,480, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,865, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 29.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 28.3%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.9%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 65.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.0%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.08, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (89.0% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.040%), college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.27%).