Chinese vs Senegalese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Senegalese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Senegalese
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,684
SOCIAL INDEX
14.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
292nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Senegalese Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,931,996 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Senegalese within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Senegalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 45.4 Senegalese.
Chinese vs Senegalese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $53,591, a difference of 44.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $86,897, a difference of 33.7%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $74,999, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,384, a difference of 5.3%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $44,373, a difference of 10.1%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $41,000, a difference of 12.4%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Senegalese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Tragic $41,000 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Tragic $91,475 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Tragic $74,999 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Tragic $44,373 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Tragic $49,774 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Fair $39,384 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $48,953 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Tragic $82,852 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Tragic $86,897 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Tragic $53,591 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 20.7% |
Chinese vs Senegalese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 76.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 73.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 70.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.8%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 25.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Senegalese |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 15.3% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 11.5% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 16.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 23.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 20.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 20.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 20.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 20.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 23.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 16.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 31.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 15.4% |
Chinese vs Senegalese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 60.3%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Senegalese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 21.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 11.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Chinese vs Senegalese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.78%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Senegalese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 66.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Poor 35.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Fair 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 82.4% |
Chinese vs Senegalese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 59.5%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 30.6%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.9%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Senegalese |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 59.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Excellent 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 8.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 40.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 36.8% |
Chinese vs Senegalese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 140.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 104.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 67.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 14.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 35.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 67.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Senegalese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 19.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 80.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 44.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 4.3% |
Chinese vs Senegalese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.87%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Senegalese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Tragic 91.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 89.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 87.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Tragic 84.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 63.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Poor 58.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Fair 45.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Average 37.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Good 15.2% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Excellent 2.0% |
Chinese vs Senegalese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Senegalese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.60%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.95%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Senegalese |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Fair 11.4% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 24.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |