Chinese vs Okinawan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Okinawan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chinese

Okinawans

Exceptional
Excellent
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,907
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
39th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Okinawan Integration in Chinese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,005,962 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Okinawans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in Okinawans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 40.2 Okinawans.
Chinese Integration in Okinawan Communities

Chinese vs Okinawan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,098 compared to $55,817, a difference of 21.1%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $67,232, a difference of 18.2%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $57,550, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $54,701, a difference of 6.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $124,796, a difference of 7.4%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $106,624, a difference of 8.3%).
Chinese vs Okinawan Income
Income MetricChineseOkinawan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,098
Exceptional
$55,817
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,188
Exceptional
$129,979
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$98,496
Exceptional
$106,624
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,836
Exceptional
$57,550
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,872
Exceptional
$67,232
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,461
Exceptional
$46,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,162
Exceptional
$54,701
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,264
Exceptional
$119,349
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$116,156
Exceptional
$124,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$77,465
Exceptional
$70,846
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.9%
Tragic
28.1%

Chinese vs Okinawan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
Chinese vs Okinawan Poverty
Poverty MetricChineseOkinawan
Poverty
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
8.7%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
13.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.1%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.6%
Exceptional
26.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
8.9%

Chinese vs Okinawan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 49.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.8%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Chinese vs Okinawan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChineseOkinawan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%

Chinese vs Okinawan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Chinese vs Okinawan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChineseOkinawan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Good
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.6%
Tragic
32.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.1%
Good
83.0%

Chinese vs Okinawan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 12.3%), family households (68.1% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.5%).
Chinese vs Okinawan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChineseOkinawan
Family Households
Exceptional
68.1%
Tragic
62.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.0%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.4%
Exceptional
47.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Exceptional
26.9%

Chinese vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 71.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 60.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 36.8%).
Chinese vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChineseOkinawan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Tragic
86.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Tragic
51.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
5.5%

Chinese vs Okinawan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 85.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 64.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (89.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
Chinese vs Okinawan Education Level
Education Level MetricChineseOkinawan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.0%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
73.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Exceptional
69.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
57.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.5%
Exceptional
50.5%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Exceptional
22.6%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
3.3%

Chinese vs Okinawan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.7%), male disability (12.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 23.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.36%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Chinese vs Okinawan Disability
Disability MetricChineseOkinawan
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
20.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%