Chinese vs Ukrainian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,000,950 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.128% in Ukrainians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 128.2 Ukrainians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $63,032, a difference of 22.9%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $53,843, a difference of 8.0%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $91,456, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,015, a difference of 1.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $102,451, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $50,320, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 24.2%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.8%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 57.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.7%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.14, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.4%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 40.2%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Ukrainian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.26%), disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.6%).