Chinese vs Burmese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Burmese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Burmese
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Burmese Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,970,838 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 85.0 Burmese.
Chinese vs Burmese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $65,236, a difference of 14.7%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $52,005, a difference of 12.8%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $54,559, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $121,444, a difference of 4.5%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $103,145, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $54,800, a difference of 6.1%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Burmese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $52,005 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $123,369 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $103,145 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $54,559 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $65,236 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Exceptional $44,911 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $54,800 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $113,701 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $121,444 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $71,139 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 28.0% |
Chinese vs Burmese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 28.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.41%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Burmese |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 18.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 26.2% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Chinese vs Burmese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.51%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Burmese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Excellent 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chinese vs Burmese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Burmese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Tragic 34.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 73.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Chinese vs Burmese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 14.7%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Burmese |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 49.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Chinese vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.7%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 15.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Burmese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 20.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Chinese vs Burmese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 37.7%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Burmese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Excellent 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Excellent 97.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 88.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 71.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 66.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 54.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 46.9% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 19.7% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Chinese vs Burmese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.4%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Burmese |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 20.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 45.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |