Chinese vs Basque Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Basque
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Basques
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,979
SOCIAL INDEX
67.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
133rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Basque Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,807,736 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Basques within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.204% in Basques. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 203.9 Basques.
Chinese vs Basque Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Basque communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,653, a difference of 23.6%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $87,001, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $103,387, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,086, a difference of 2.2%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $55,370, a difference of 2.7%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,399, a difference of 5.2%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Basque |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Excellent $45,086 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Good $104,760 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Good $87,001 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Average $46,399 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Good $55,370 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Tragic $38,352 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Fair $51,818 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Good $96,709 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Excellent $103,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Excellent $62,653 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 28.8% |
Chinese vs Basque Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Basque communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 34.1%), single female poverty (16.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 32.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.96%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Basque |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 11.9% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Good 10.9% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 21.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Average 13.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Fair 29.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese vs Basque Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Basque communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Basque |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Excellent 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Fair 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chinese vs Basque Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Basque communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Basque |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 39.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 82.0% |
Chinese vs Basque Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Basque communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.5%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 1.7%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Basque |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Good 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 48.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 29.7% |
Chinese vs Basque Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Basque communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.58%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Basque |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 61.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 24.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Chinese vs Basque Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Basque communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Basque |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Excellent 96.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 93.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Excellent 89.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Good 86.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Excellent 60.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Average 46.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Average 37.7% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Fair 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Excellent 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Good 1.9% |
Chinese vs Basque Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Basque communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.27%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.44%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Basque |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Fair 23.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Fair 47.6% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Excellent 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.4% |