Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Grenada
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Grenada
Immigrants from China
1,656
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
293rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Grenada Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,382,248 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.093% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 93.4 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 65.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $122,178, a difference of 42.8%), and median family income ($89,249 compared to $125,540, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $57,931, a difference of 6.2%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $46,972, a difference of 12.0%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $56,638, a difference of 24.2%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Immigrants from China |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,123 | Exceptional $54,264 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $89,249 | Exceptional $125,540 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $76,517 | Exceptional $105,335 |
| Median Earnings | Fair $45,596 | Exceptional $56,638 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,279 | Exceptional $67,353 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,932 | Exceptional $46,972 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,538 | Exceptional $57,931 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,311 | Exceptional $119,756 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,552 | Exceptional $122,178 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,747 | Exceptional $69,174 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 16.2% | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 86.0%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 58.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.1%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.3%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Immigrants from China |
| Poverty | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Families | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Males | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 10.7% |
| Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Average 20.2% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Single Females | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 26.1% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 7.3% | Excellent 5.0% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 11.5% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 47.5%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 44.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.0%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Immigrants from China |
| Unemployment | Tragic 6.9% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Tragic 7.6% | Good 5.2% |
| Females | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 15.8% | Average 11.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.7% | Good 17.5% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Fair 10.4% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Average 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.4% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Poor 5.2% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Immigrants from China |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Excellent 65.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.7% | Good 79.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 31.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 67.2% | Tragic 71.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.8% | Average 84.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.3% | Exceptional 84.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.0% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 61.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 47.1%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.5%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Immigrants from China |
| Family Households | Tragic 62.6% | Excellent 64.7% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.2% | Average 27.4% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 39.1% | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 147.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 120.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 100.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 35.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 79.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 100.4%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Immigrants from China |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 37.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 62.7% | Tragic 84.9% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 28.7% | Tragic 51.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 18.2% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 2.7% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 125.3%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 79.9%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.23%), 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Immigrants from China |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 97.0% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Tragic 96.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 95.0% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 93.0% | Tragic 94.3% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Tragic 93.2% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Fair 92.3% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.4% | Good 91.3% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 85.6% | Good 89.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 86.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.1% | Exceptional 70.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.6% | Exceptional 55.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.0% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 21.2% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 27.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Grenada | Immigrants from China |
| Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Females | Fair 12.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.94% | Exceptional 0.96% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.8% | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 47.9% | Exceptional 46.3% |
| Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |