Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,783,717 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.423. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.146% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to a decrease of 145.8 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,434 compared to $54,264, a difference of 34.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,533 compared to $119,756, a difference of 30.8%), and median male earnings ($51,594 compared to $67,353, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $57,931, a difference of 10.4%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,580 compared to $69,174, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 45.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 35.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.030%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 44.8%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.8%), and births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 48.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 102.0%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 84.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.0%), disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.5%).