Chinese vs Estonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,018,149 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Estonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 62.8 Estonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $67,926, a difference of 14.0%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,523, a difference of 12.9%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $51,875, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($116,188 compared to $118,013, a difference of 1.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $114,220, a difference of 1.7%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $95,930, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 28.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and single female poverty (16.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.0%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 49.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in family households (68.1% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 8.3%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.10, a difference of 7.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.33%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 39.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 43.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.5%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), 8th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Estonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.2%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.91%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.1%).