Chinese vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,214
SOCIAL INDEX
79.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
82nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Europe Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,411,577 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.088% in Immigrants from Eastern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 87.9 Immigrants from Eastern Europe.
Chinese vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,693, a difference of 23.6%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $60,958, a difference of 7.2%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $49,316, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $104,662, a difference of 0.38%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $112,527, a difference of 3.3%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Eastern Europe |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $49,316 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $112,527 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $93,051 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $51,624 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $60,958 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Exceptional $43,309 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $55,572 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $104,662 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $109,335 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Excellent $62,693 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Poor 26.4% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 38.9%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 33.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Eastern Europe |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 27.2% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Excellent 10.8% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 49.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Eastern Europe |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.60%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Eastern Europe |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Good 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Poor 35.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Fair 74.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 9.7%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and family households (68.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.98%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Eastern Europe |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Poor 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.17 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 27.6% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 65.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 62.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 37.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Eastern Europe |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 86.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 51.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 17.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 5.4% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.8%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Eastern Europe |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 93.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 67.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 62.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 50.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 42.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 17.6% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.8%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.41%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Eastern Europe |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Average 3.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.5% |