Chinese vs German Russian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,863,421 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of German Russians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.489. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in German Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 29.6 German Russians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $55,356, a difference of 39.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $89,398, a difference of 29.9%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $75,856, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 5.2%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $37,105, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $43,200, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 55.8%), single female poverty (16.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 48.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.8%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.5%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 42.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.1%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.15, a difference of 6.2%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 28.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.5%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and German Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.27%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.96%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.0%).