Chinese vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,701,824 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 10.1 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $66,118, a difference of 17.2%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $50,984, a difference of 14.1%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $52,217, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($116,188 compared to $115,847, a difference of 0.29%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $106,629, a difference of 2.3%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,837, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 32.3%), and single female poverty (16.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.7%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.7%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in family households (68.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 9.8%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.41%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.6%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 39.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.7%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.8%).