Chinese vs Swedish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Swedish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Swedes
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Swedish Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,584,728 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 63.3 Swedes.
Chinese vs Swedish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,736, a difference of 23.5%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $88,524, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,750, a difference of 0.76%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $57,445, a difference of 1.0%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,851, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Swedish |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $45,750 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $108,499 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $88,524 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Excellent $47,851 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $57,445 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Fair $39,421 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Excellent $52,986 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $99,136 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $106,377 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Excellent $62,736 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 29.4% |
Chinese vs Swedish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 27.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.8%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Swedish |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Average 20.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Good 20.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Excellent 28.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Chinese vs Swedish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 69.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.77%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Swedish |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Excellent 7.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Chinese vs Swedish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Swedish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 44.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 78.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Chinese vs Swedish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.5%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.10, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 0.91%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Swedish |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 50.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 29.6% |
Chinese vs Swedish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Swedish |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 93.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 61.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Chinese vs Swedish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.9%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Swedish |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 94.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 93.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 92.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 88.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 68.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 62.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Good 39.1% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Good 15.2% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Excellent 2.0% |
Chinese vs Swedish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.56%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Swedish |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |