Chinese vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,424,737 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.456. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.066% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 65.9 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $53,232, a difference of 45.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $86,764, a difference of 33.9%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $88,034, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 14.2%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,930, a difference of 15.4%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $41,474, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 127.5%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 104.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 89.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 39.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 39.8%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 40.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 55.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 41.0%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 46.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.35, a difference of 0.20%), family households (68.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 62.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 93.1%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.9%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 3.6%), male disability (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.7%).