Jordanian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,218,573 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.170. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.069% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to a decrease of 69.3 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $119,756, a difference of 20.7%), per capita income ($45,605 compared to $54,264, a difference of 19.0%), and median male earnings ($58,500 compared to $67,353, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.43%), householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $69,174, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $122,178, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 14.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.6%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), currently married (48.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 77.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.0%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 41.9%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.2% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 16.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.56%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.80%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%).