Chinese vs Slovak Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,007,925 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Slovaks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 47.0 Slovaks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,039, a difference of 31.2%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $83,798, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $49,753, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,306, a difference of 1.0%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,095, a difference of 3.7%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $44,229, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 35.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 33.1%), and single female poverty (16.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 76.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.6%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 40.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.7%), college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.0%), high school diploma (92.0% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Slovak communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.7%).