Chinese vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,259,583 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.283% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 283.1 Soviet Union.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,848, a difference of 23.3%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $54,202, a difference of 17.6%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $46,556, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($116,188 compared to $119,262, a difference of 2.6%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $95,098, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $112,008, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 59.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 50.6%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.4%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 30.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 15.0%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and family households (68.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.34%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 112.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 99.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 11.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 31.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 68.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 47.1%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 40.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 20.6%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.28%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.5%).