Chinese vs Albanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,010,267 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Albanians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Albanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 97.0 Albanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $60,249, a difference of 28.6%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $89,744, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $106,243, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.9%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $50,116, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,584, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 40.5%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 38.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 11.6%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 46.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.5%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.55%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 90.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 85.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 8.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 51.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.6%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.040%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.72%).