Chinese vs American Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
American
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Americans
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,435
SOCIAL INDEX
31.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
220th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
American Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,705,208 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Americans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.346. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.391% in Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 391.5 Americans.
Chinese vs American Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and American communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $55,527, a difference of 39.5%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $75,932, a difference of 29.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $90,536, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 7.5%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $50,761, a difference of 12.0%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $42,742, a difference of 14.3%).
Income Metric | Chinese | American |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Tragic $39,039 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Tragic $92,096 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Tragic $75,932 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Tragic $42,742 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Tragic $50,761 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Tragic $35,777 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $48,860 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Tragic $84,791 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Tragic $90,536 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Tragic $55,527 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 27.8% |
Chinese vs American Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and American communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 56.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 56.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 24.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 30.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | American |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 20.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 18.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 18.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 20.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 33.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Fair 12.2% |
Chinese vs American Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 36.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | American |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chinese vs American Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | American |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 40.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 83.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 82.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 80.4% |
Chinese vs American Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.2%), family households (68.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | American |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 36.4% |
Chinese vs American Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.6%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | American |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 92.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 60.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Chinese vs American Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.2%), bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | American |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 61.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 54.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 40.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 31.9% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 12.3% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chinese vs American Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and American communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 39.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.64%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.5%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | American |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 25.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 7.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |