Chinese vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,464,292 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 23.0 Immigrants from Sudan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,248, a difference of 30.7%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $79,103, a difference of 24.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $46,791, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $38,511, a difference of 7.7%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $44,767, a difference of 9.1%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 58.3%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.3%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 55.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 33.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.9%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 60.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 36.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.2%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.1%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.5%), female disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.8%).