Chinese vs Immigrants from Sierra Leone Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,424,812 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Immigrants from Sierra Leone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 44.0 Immigrants from Sierra Leone.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 20.9%), householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $66,009, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $103,227, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,214, a difference of 1.8%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,875, a difference of 2.0%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $53,905, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 45.7%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.9%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.8%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 44.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 48.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.49%), family households (68.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.9%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 38.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 67.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Sierra Leone communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.1%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.3%).