Chinese vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Tsimshian
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 6,683,079 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 39.0 Tsimshian.
Chinese vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $58,202, a difference of 33.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $96,783, a difference of 20.0%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $83,346, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,530, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $54,649, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $97,809, a difference of 6.6%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Chinese vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 77.2%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 61.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.90%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 9.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Chinese vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 169.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 91.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 78.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.6% |
Chinese vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 77.4% |
Chinese vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.5%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 39.4%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 42.2% |
Chinese vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 25.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.48%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Fair 6.2% |
Chinese vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.3%), bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 33.7%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.070%), 11th grade (94.6% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.30%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chinese vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 111.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 69.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.9%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |