Chinese vs Macedonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,088,565 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.130% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 129.5 Macedonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,564, a difference of 25.8%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $90,761, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,286, a difference of 0.43%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,893, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $101,882, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 23.7%), and married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 63.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.5%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.13, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 60.8%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 47.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 34.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.4%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.19%), 8th grade (96.9% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.7%).