Chinese vs Pueblo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,036,096 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pueblo within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.054% in Pueblo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 53.9 Pueblo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $75,601, a difference of 53.6%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $64,692, a difference of 52.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $68,910, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 25.3%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $32,564, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $45,018, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 204.8%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 161.1%), and male poverty (8.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 113.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 37.1%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 51.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 66.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 72.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 71.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 77.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 67.6%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.79, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 30.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 50.6%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 42.9%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 62.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 52.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 14.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.7%).