Chinese vs Egyptian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,231,181 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Egyptians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.507. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.209% in Egyptians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 208.8 Egyptians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $65,441, a difference of 18.4%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $61,095, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $54,444, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $105,282, a difference of 0.98%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $114,119, a difference of 1.8%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.9%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.8%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.6%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.95%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.3%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 44.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.3%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.7%).