Chinese vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Latvia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Latvia
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Latvia Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,592,675 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Immigrants from Latvia.
Chinese vs Immigrants from Latvia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $64,298, a difference of 20.5%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,737, a difference of 12.4%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $50,914, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($116,188 compared to $114,826, a difference of 1.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $105,522, a difference of 1.2%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Latvia |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Exceptional $50,914 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $114,826 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $93,602 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $51,555 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Exceptional $61,422 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Exceptional $43,099 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Fair $51,737 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Exceptional $105,522 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $111,454 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $64,298 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Tragic 26.7% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.4%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Latvia |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Latvia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Latvia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.4% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Latvia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.68%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Latvia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Good 36.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in family households (68.1% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 9.9%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.13, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.60%), single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Latvia |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 62.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 25.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Exceptional 29.1% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Latvia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 61.2%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 47.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 37.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Latvia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 88.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 52.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 17.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Latvia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.9%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Latvia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 70.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 52.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Chinese vs Immigrants from Latvia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Immigrants from Latvia |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Good 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |