Chinese vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,613,217 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.161% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 1,161.4 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,440, a difference of 26.1%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $88,976, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $105,309, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,663, a difference of 0.37%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,032, a difference of 1.7%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,177, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 31.0%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 76.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.4%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.5%), currently married (49.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.33%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.1%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%), male disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.2%).