Chinese vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,858,985 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.422. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.200% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 200.3 Immigrants from South America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,151, a difference of 31.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $99,126, a difference of 17.2%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $100,414, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,643, a difference of 4.6%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $44,068, a difference of 4.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,548, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 58.9%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 57.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.4%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 46.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.1%), family households (68.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 70.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 42.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 37.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 66.5%), college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.37%), bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 38.7%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.2%).