Chinese vs Immigrants from Portugal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,669,421 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Portugal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 41.0 Immigrants from Portugal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $55,924, a difference of 38.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $99,203, a difference of 17.1%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $84,740, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $55,182, a difference of 3.1%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,304, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 53.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 46.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 77.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 42.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 39.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.5%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.18, a difference of 5.0%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.5%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 42.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 81.2%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 25.8%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), male disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.3%).