Chinese vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,026,287 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.573. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.289% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 289.2 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,526, a difference of 42.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $87,705, a difference of 32.4%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $88,295, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,525, a difference of 12.9%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 14.5%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,695, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 93.0%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 80.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.0%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 48.8%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 50.3%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 48.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.40, a difference of 1.9%), family households (68.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 134.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 0.59%).