Portuguese vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 400,209,553 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.568. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 21.6 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,362 compared to $54,264, a difference of 22.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $119,756, a difference of 20.4%), and median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $67,353, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $57,931, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $69,174, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 27.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.44%), female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 28.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 37.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.0%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.70%), currently married (47.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 76.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 76.3%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 65.6%), and master's degree (13.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.3% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.18%), 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and 11th grade (92.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 67.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.7%).