Chinese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,024,374 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.214% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 213.9 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $68,960, a difference of 21.3%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $57,114, a difference of 17.0%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $52,660, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $57,818, a difference of 0.59%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $124,188, a difference of 6.9%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $106,057, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.4%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 22.5%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.37%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 23.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.41%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 48.9%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 42.2%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.5%), male disability (12.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 27.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.90%), cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.3%).