Chinese vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,455,983 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.985. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.568% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 1,567.6 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $76,903, a difference of 51.0%), householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $51,719, a difference of 49.8%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $79,563, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 14.1%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $47,907, a difference of 21.4%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $33,894, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 102.7%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 95.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 92.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 139.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 85.2%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 113.7%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 77.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 69.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.30, a difference of 1.1%), family households (68.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 77.9%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 43.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 39.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 43.9%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 43.0%), and bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 101.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 54.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.7%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 7.3%).