Chinese vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,720,443 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 14.6 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $56,722, a difference of 36.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $90,909, a difference of 27.8%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $92,239, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 8.7%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $36,841, a difference of 12.5%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $42,884, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 57.3%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 56.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.3%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 50.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 48.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.0%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.090%), family households (68.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 113.8%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 26.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.98%), male disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.5%).