Chinese vs Croatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,197,844 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Croatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 18.1 Croatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $63,225, a difference of 22.5%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,662, a difference of 12.6%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,993, a difference of 1.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $102,414, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,724, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 22.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 62.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.34 compared to 3.10, a difference of 7.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.22%), currently married (49.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.010%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.7%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.010%), college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and 12th grade, no diploma (93.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.98%).