Chinese vs Iranian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,152,045 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Iranians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.449. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.145% in Iranians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 144.6 Iranians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,098 compared to $58,786, a difference of 27.5%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $70,648, a difference of 24.2%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $58,474, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $77,429, a difference of 0.050%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $55,548, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $129,350, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 24.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 19.5%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.40%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 78.4%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 70.8%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.22%), 10th grade (95.5% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and ged/equivalency (89.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.2%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 6.2%).