Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Puget Sound Salish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Puget Sound Salish

Immigrants from China

Average
Good
5,672
SOCIAL INDEX
54.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
172nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Puget Sound Salish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,734,304 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.438. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.051% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to a decrease of 50.7 Immigrants from China.
Puget Sound Salish Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,495 compared to $54,264, a difference of 30.8%), median family income ($97,958 compared to $125,540, a difference of 28.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,661 compared to $119,756, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $57,931, a difference of 4.3%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,934 compared to $69,174, a difference of 15.4%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricPuget Sound SalishImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,495
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,958
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Fair
$84,011
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Average
$46,333
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,704
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,376
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,543
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,661
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,340
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,934
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Poor
26.7%

Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 37.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 27.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.57%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricPuget Sound SalishImmigrants from China
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.0%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.8%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.6%

Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.83%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPuget Sound SalishImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Average
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.5%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.9%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%

Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 25.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPuget Sound SalishImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.7%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.0%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.5%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.2%

Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.5%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 33.1%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.070%), currently married (47.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and family households (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPuget Sound SalishImmigrants from China
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Exceptional
24.7%

Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 59.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 55.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 20.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 44.8%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPuget Sound SalishImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Poor
6.0%

Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 156.9%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 118.5%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 90.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.9% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.61%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.82%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricPuget Sound SalishImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.9%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.9%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.7%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Exceptional
3.1%

Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 53.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 52.8%), and hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 0.95%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.6%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricPuget Sound SalishImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.97%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%