French vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,611,957 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to a decrease of 7.1 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,665 compared to $119,756, a difference of 27.9%), median household income ($83,468 compared to $105,335, a difference of 26.2%), and per capita income ($43,685 compared to $54,264, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $57,931, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $69,174, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 27.7%), and single male poverty (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), poverty (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 35.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 35.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.88%), family households (64.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 103.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 72.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 68.2%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 58.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 75.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 45.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.6%).