Chinese vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,204,213 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.638. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.244% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 244.2 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,093, a difference of 26.8%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $49,113, a difference of 18.4%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $86,635, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,617, a difference of 0.45%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $57,572, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,825, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 34.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 30.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.5%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 63.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in family households (68.1% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 11.6%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 60.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 32.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.1%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.010%), ged/equivalency (89.0% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and 12th grade, no diploma (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.2%).