Chinese vs Armenian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,490,375 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Armenians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 83.5 Armenians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,656, a difference of 25.6%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $53,179, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $107,002, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $103,248, a difference of 0.98%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,212, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,804, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 56.7%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 51.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.12%), single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 15.4%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 66.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.8%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 32.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.37%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.8%).