Chinese vs Cheyenne Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Cheyenne
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Cheyenne
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,791
SOCIAL INDEX
15.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
287th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cheyenne Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,499,046 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.159% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 158.9 Cheyenne.
Chinese vs Cheyenne Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $76,362, a difference of 52.1%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $66,974, a difference of 47.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,096, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 11.1%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $35,673, a difference of 16.2%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $40,233, a difference of 21.4%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Cheyenne |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Tragic $35,276 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Tragic $81,385 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Tragic $66,974 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Tragic $40,233 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Tragic $46,062 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Tragic $35,673 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Tragic $45,275 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Tragic $79,152 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Tragic $76,362 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Tragic $54,096 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 23.3% |
Chinese vs Cheyenne Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 158.7%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 119.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 117.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.5%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 46.3%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 46.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Cheyenne |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 18.9% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 14.3% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 17.6% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 20.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 28.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 28.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 25.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 25.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 38.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Tragic 9.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 13.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 14.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Chinese vs Cheyenne Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 166.7%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 99.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 97.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 29.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Cheyenne |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 22.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 8.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 8.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 16.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.8% |
Chinese vs Cheyenne Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Cheyenne |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 62.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 37.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 73.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 81.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 77.6% |
Chinese vs Cheyenne Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 56.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 48.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.47, a difference of 4.0%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households (68.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 7.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Cheyenne |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Tragic 63.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 42.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.47 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 8.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 42.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 41.3% |
Chinese vs Cheyenne Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 42.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 6.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Cheyenne |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 88.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Poor 54.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Chinese vs Cheyenne Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.3%), bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 30.6%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Cheyenne |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 89.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Tragic 82.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 60.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 38.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Tragic 11.2% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chinese vs Cheyenne Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 51.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 43.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 5.1%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Cheyenne |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 31.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 50.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |