Chinese vs Liberian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,212,184 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.127. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Liberians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 23.7 Liberians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,356, a difference of 42.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $88,929, a difference of 30.6%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $75,667, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $38,215, a difference of 8.5%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $43,536, a difference of 12.2%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $49,318, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 63.4%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 63.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.9%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 73.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 67.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.0%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and family households (68.1% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 68.5%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 40.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 61.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.31%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.4%).