Chinese vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,553,693 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.695. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.198% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 198.0 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $61,244, a difference of 26.5%), median household income ($98,496 compared to $86,164, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,421, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,546, a difference of 0.58%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $44,595, a difference of 3.4%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,221, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (16.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 30.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 64.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.4%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.11, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 0.72%), births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.4%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.9%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.7%).