Chinese vs Immigrants from Croatia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,657,485 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Immigrants from Croatia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 88.0 Immigrants from Croatia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $63,168, a difference of 22.6%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $50,417, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $108,304, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $104,503, a difference of 0.23%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and median family income ($116,188 compared to $112,323, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.6%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in family households (68.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 8.0%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.14, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.80%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 65.4%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 58.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 38.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.4%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 18.6%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.59%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%).