Spanish American vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,400,437 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Spanish American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spanish Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.147% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spanish Americans corresponds to an increase of 147.4 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,722 compared to $119,756, a difference of 43.0%), median household income ($75,386 compared to $105,335, a difference of 39.7%), and per capita income ($39,012 compared to $54,264, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.4%), householder income over 65 years ($57,021 compared to $69,174, a difference of 21.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,913 compared to $57,931, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 49.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 47.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 25.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 56.2%), single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.44%), and family households (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 67.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 80.5%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 73.0%), and master's degree (13.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.2% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (92.9% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 60.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 57.0%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 18.8%).